I made the recovered cherry coke ice crystals into alcohol-filled ICEE's with the magic bullet and some Kahlua. It tastes pretty much like what I expected: ok. But it enrages me when I drink my salvaged Coke smoothie and read on weather.com that a plurality of online voters, (39.4%) do not think that global warming is true.
Frankly, I'm surprised at this. I don't understand how this misconception is out there. I offer my armchair ruminations:
1. Shoddy science reporting. Even though our society is increasingly driven by technology and this technology relies on advances in science, the layperson has a very ill-informed view on science or how the scientific method works. Blame schools all you want, but I'm of the opinion that this is because people have very ill-informed views on just about anything not relating to their narrow experience. I may be really into environmental chemistry and air pollution control and measurement, but I don't know a whole lot about (say) livestock.
I feel like people have this too-perfect view of science. If a man with a white lab coat says it is true, it Must Be So. Furthermore, complicated variables, conflicting data, systematic and random error do not exist- everyone must agree on science. As a corollary, when two scientists disagree, the effect they are researching must not be very scientific. The jury's still out.
But it's not. There is a huge consensus that the Earth is warming. You may blame it on sun spots or random chance or volcanoes, but you don't get to blame it on the Jew-run media anymore.
2. Shoddy political work. Why is this even a political issue? Democrats are more likely to believe in global warming, Republicans are more likely to not believe in it. This might be a nefarious plot by the Republicans to Destroy the Planet, but I'm more apt to quote Upton Sinclair: "If a man's paycheck depends on his not understanding something, you can rely upon his not understanding it." Sorry, oil companies.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Disaster!
Someone put two cans of Cherry Coke Zero in the freezer where they exploded. I cut my thumb taking one of the cans out, and can only hope that I've brushed out the remaining bits of frozen Coke from on top of the chicken breasts, ice cream, and venison steak.
I hope I don't get tetanus from this.
I hope I don't get tetanus from this.
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Back to Politics
There's this girl that I like. Now it appears that she likes another guy. It must be because he's political and stuff. I bet I could be political, too.
I'm beginning to think, as a Democrat, that having Hillary Clinton in the race is good for the party's chances in the fall. I guess I'm alone in this. The claim is being put forth that Hillary Clinton wants to win so badly that she's willing to go to any length to do it, and if that means salting the Earth so that no Democrat can grow, SO BE IT!
I first disagree with this point just as an accurate narrative of what has happened. Clinton hasn't been that cutthroat. About the only things I can remember that qualify are:
1. Reverend Wright. Was this an incredibly off-base attack that has nothing to do with anything? Yes. Was it damaging to Barack Obama? Maybe. It's strange, but pundits give evidence for this by showing exit polling data. Of those people who didn't vote for Obama, a major reason given was Rev. Wright. But, if you look at the overall trend for Obama, his numbers before and after Wright in terms of popularity and so on were pretty much equal. They went down, sure, but they were already going down before Wright was ever an issue, and they've gone back up since.
In other words: it appears from my armchair analysis that Rev. Wright didn't cause many people to not vote for Obama. Instead, it gave people who were already not going to vote for him a reason for doing this. This fits in well with one understanding of psychology and behavior: we're much more likely to pick a conclusion and build reasons around it, rather than weighing evidence and reaching a conclusion.
2. That commercial where the kid is sleeping and the phone is ringing at the White House. Do you know where your children are!? So it was a silly commercial. Not exactly going for the throat.
3. The One Where Obama Knows That One Guy. Clinton (or someone) said that Obama lived next door to some other guy who did bad things. And also, when he was a lawyer, Obama did some work for a guy who was a radical in the 1970's. Maybe it was the same person? I don't know. But whatever. My point is that it's pretty tame and not very damaging to Obama's chances in November.
Further bolstering my first point that Hillary Clinton hasn't been playing ruthless: if you think she can be mean, just wait for the Republicans and John McCain. Hillary Clinton may say, "Think of the Children!", but John McCain has already said that terrorists want Obama to win. If I'm recalling correctly, it wasn't Hillary Clinton's people who have circulated the rumor that Barack Obama is a Muslim- that would be the crazy right.
So, to conclude my meandering first point: Hillary Clinton isn't salting the Earth. She poses a very small threat for Democrat's chances in November.
My Second Reason Why Hillary Clinton Staying In The Race Isn't As Bad As You Think: it's kind of like altitude training for Obama. We can argue all we want about whether Obama's health care plan covers everyone (it doesn't), or if Hillary's plan will turn us into France (I hope so). But just discussing the issue gets it into everyone's consciousness and frames the debate in a positive manner for Democrats come November. Imagine how completely inadequate John McCain will look by comparison when he says that he wants employers to, uh, group together, or something.
Extend this to any issue you'd like. The longer Barack and Hillary talk about their plans for Iraq, the more that hurts John McCain when he says we should stay there for 100 years and bomb Iran and Palestine and yadda yadda.
So, to conclude:
1. Having Hillary Clinton in the race at the very least poses little threat to Obama's chances in November. She hasn't taken the gloves off (at least not yet), and doesn't seem to be going for the killing blow any time soon.
2. It may actually help the Democrats because it frames issues in a Democratic light.
Of course, this ignores the fact that John McCain is free to do whatever he wants in the meantime before Denver, while Obama is getting pounded. Don't worry. Even if the nomination process goes all the way to Denver, that leaves Obama plenty of time to beat up McCain. Witness Barack schooling him re: Al Qaeda in Iraq. Barack doesn't really start attacks well, but his reaction to them makes his opponent look like an idiot. He's like the anti-Kerry.
I'm beginning to think, as a Democrat, that having Hillary Clinton in the race is good for the party's chances in the fall. I guess I'm alone in this. The claim is being put forth that Hillary Clinton wants to win so badly that she's willing to go to any length to do it, and if that means salting the Earth so that no Democrat can grow, SO BE IT!
I first disagree with this point just as an accurate narrative of what has happened. Clinton hasn't been that cutthroat. About the only things I can remember that qualify are:
1. Reverend Wright. Was this an incredibly off-base attack that has nothing to do with anything? Yes. Was it damaging to Barack Obama? Maybe. It's strange, but pundits give evidence for this by showing exit polling data. Of those people who didn't vote for Obama, a major reason given was Rev. Wright. But, if you look at the overall trend for Obama, his numbers before and after Wright in terms of popularity and so on were pretty much equal. They went down, sure, but they were already going down before Wright was ever an issue, and they've gone back up since.
In other words: it appears from my armchair analysis that Rev. Wright didn't cause many people to not vote for Obama. Instead, it gave people who were already not going to vote for him a reason for doing this. This fits in well with one understanding of psychology and behavior: we're much more likely to pick a conclusion and build reasons around it, rather than weighing evidence and reaching a conclusion.
2. That commercial where the kid is sleeping and the phone is ringing at the White House. Do you know where your children are!? So it was a silly commercial. Not exactly going for the throat.
3. The One Where Obama Knows That One Guy. Clinton (or someone) said that Obama lived next door to some other guy who did bad things. And also, when he was a lawyer, Obama did some work for a guy who was a radical in the 1970's. Maybe it was the same person? I don't know. But whatever. My point is that it's pretty tame and not very damaging to Obama's chances in November.
Further bolstering my first point that Hillary Clinton hasn't been playing ruthless: if you think she can be mean, just wait for the Republicans and John McCain. Hillary Clinton may say, "Think of the Children!", but John McCain has already said that terrorists want Obama to win. If I'm recalling correctly, it wasn't Hillary Clinton's people who have circulated the rumor that Barack Obama is a Muslim- that would be the crazy right.
So, to conclude my meandering first point: Hillary Clinton isn't salting the Earth. She poses a very small threat for Democrat's chances in November.
My Second Reason Why Hillary Clinton Staying In The Race Isn't As Bad As You Think: it's kind of like altitude training for Obama. We can argue all we want about whether Obama's health care plan covers everyone (it doesn't), or if Hillary's plan will turn us into France (I hope so). But just discussing the issue gets it into everyone's consciousness and frames the debate in a positive manner for Democrats come November. Imagine how completely inadequate John McCain will look by comparison when he says that he wants employers to, uh, group together, or something.
Extend this to any issue you'd like. The longer Barack and Hillary talk about their plans for Iraq, the more that hurts John McCain when he says we should stay there for 100 years and bomb Iran and Palestine and yadda yadda.
So, to conclude:
1. Having Hillary Clinton in the race at the very least poses little threat to Obama's chances in November. She hasn't taken the gloves off (at least not yet), and doesn't seem to be going for the killing blow any time soon.
2. It may actually help the Democrats because it frames issues in a Democratic light.
Of course, this ignores the fact that John McCain is free to do whatever he wants in the meantime before Denver, while Obama is getting pounded. Don't worry. Even if the nomination process goes all the way to Denver, that leaves Obama plenty of time to beat up McCain. Witness Barack schooling him re: Al Qaeda in Iraq. Barack doesn't really start attacks well, but his reaction to them makes his opponent look like an idiot. He's like the anti-Kerry.
Saturday, May 10, 2008
John 17 and a Wii
We just got a Wii, and it is so freaking fun you have no idea. On to John 17.
I'd like to note again that this section both 'give[s] eternal life' and also defines what that eternal life consists of. Jesus didn't die on the cross so that we might never die, but in exchange our eternal life consists of reading owner's manuals for all of eternity. It's an eternal life, and a life that consists of things that are worthy of eternity.
I remember being completely freaked out as a kid at the concept of eternity one night. I couldn't sleep at all, the whole night, I just couldn't stop thinking that a consciousness that goes on forever would be a terrible thing. Probably that's because our normal experience is so often filled with pain or suffering or boredom or discomfort or ennui or melancholy that I couldn't imagine anything else. But I'm not asking for an eternal life with 'the only true God, and Jesus Christ' to be non-stop pleasure, either. It gets too saccharine that way. It's more than pleasure, it's the happiness that can only come from finally coming home after a long trip, of being reconciled to a friend, of being at peace with someone you originally hated.
John 17:17 is often used as support for the proposition that the Bible is divinely inspired and is therefore what we should use for deciding theology, as opposed to, say, popular opinion or the authority of Popes or councils. I never really thought it was all that fair: "the Bible says that the Bible is true" is circular reasoning at its finest. But I've come to a better understanding of this verse in particular as a result of making my way through the earlier parts of John.
It could be the defining message of this entire gospel: the Truth. John recalls Jesus proclaiming himself "The Way, The Truth, and The Life." He says that all those "on the side of Truth listen to me." Pilate will later sneer, "What is Truth?"
And what is it? I think the blind man Jesus healed earlier in the Gospel (chapter 9) sums it up nicely:
24A second time they summoned the man who had been blind. "Give glory to God,[b]" they said. "We know this man [Jesus] is a sinner."
Or look later when Jesus is arrested and smarts off to the High Priest and gets hit in the face. Jesus says, "If I said something wrong, testify as to what is wrong. But if what I said was the truth, why did you hit me?"
That's not really a rhetorical question, you know. The man hit Jesus not because he thought Jesus was lying- he knew that Jesus was telling the truth. Why did he hit him, then? Perhaps he was scared of what would happen to him if he didn't. Perhaps he was simply a cruel person. At rock bottom, he hit Jesus because he preferred his own lies to Jesus' truth, just as Eve preferred the Serpent's lies.
So that passage, "Your word is truth" is a little more meaningful than "the Bible says that the Bible is true". I hope I'm expressing this coherently.
A call for unity of purpose throughout the Church that I still long to see. Thy kingdom come, on Earth as it is in Heaven. Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
Jesus Prays for Himself
1After Jesus said this, he looked toward heaven and prayed: "Father, the time has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you. 2For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. 3Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. 4I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do. 5And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.I'd like to note again that this section both 'give[s] eternal life' and also defines what that eternal life consists of. Jesus didn't die on the cross so that we might never die, but in exchange our eternal life consists of reading owner's manuals for all of eternity. It's an eternal life, and a life that consists of things that are worthy of eternity.
I remember being completely freaked out as a kid at the concept of eternity one night. I couldn't sleep at all, the whole night, I just couldn't stop thinking that a consciousness that goes on forever would be a terrible thing. Probably that's because our normal experience is so often filled with pain or suffering or boredom or discomfort or ennui or melancholy that I couldn't imagine anything else. But I'm not asking for an eternal life with 'the only true God, and Jesus Christ' to be non-stop pleasure, either. It gets too saccharine that way. It's more than pleasure, it's the happiness that can only come from finally coming home after a long trip, of being reconciled to a friend, of being at peace with someone you originally hated.
Jesus Prays for His Disciples
6"I have revealed you[a] to those whom you gave me out of the world. They were yours; you gave them to me and they have obeyed your word. 7Now they know that everything you have given me comes from you. 8For I gave them the words you gave me and they accepted them. They knew with certainty that I came from you, and they believed that you sent me. 9I pray for them. I am not praying for the world, but for those you have given me, for they are yours. 10All I have is yours, and all you have is mine. And glory has come to me through them. 11I will remain in the world no longer, but they are still in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name—the name you gave me—so that they may be one as we are one. 12While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled. 13"I am coming to you now, but I say these things while I am still in the world, so that they may have the full measure of my joy within them. 14I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. 15My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. 16They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. 17Sanctify[b] them by the truth; your word is truth. 18As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world. 19For them I sanctify myself, that they too may be truly sanctified.John 17:17 is often used as support for the proposition that the Bible is divinely inspired and is therefore what we should use for deciding theology, as opposed to, say, popular opinion or the authority of Popes or councils. I never really thought it was all that fair: "the Bible says that the Bible is true" is circular reasoning at its finest. But I've come to a better understanding of this verse in particular as a result of making my way through the earlier parts of John.
It could be the defining message of this entire gospel: the Truth. John recalls Jesus proclaiming himself "The Way, The Truth, and The Life." He says that all those "on the side of Truth listen to me." Pilate will later sneer, "What is Truth?"
And what is it? I think the blind man Jesus healed earlier in the Gospel (chapter 9) sums it up nicely:
24A second time they summoned the man who had been blind. "Give glory to God,[b]" they said. "We know this man [Jesus] is a sinner."
25He replied, "Whether he is a sinner or not, I don't know. One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!"
26Then they asked him, "What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?"
27He answered, "I have told you already and you did not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you want to become his disciples, too?"
28Then they hurled insults at him and said, "You are this fellow's disciple! We are disciples of Moses! 29We know that God spoke to Moses, but as for this fellow, we don't even know where he comes from."
30The man answered, "Now that is remarkable! You don't know where he comes from, yet he opened my eyes. 31We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly man who does his will. 32Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind. 33If this man were not from God, he could do nothing."
34To this they replied, "You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!" And they threw him out.
The image is pretty remarkable. The self-deception shown by the Pharisees here is incredible- they are truly spiritually blind. Jesus speaks the Truth: he says that he is God, and he is, he says people are sinful, and they are. Jesus explains exactly how the world works, and the world rejects him.Or look later when Jesus is arrested and smarts off to the High Priest and gets hit in the face. Jesus says, "If I said something wrong, testify as to what is wrong. But if what I said was the truth, why did you hit me?"
That's not really a rhetorical question, you know. The man hit Jesus not because he thought Jesus was lying- he knew that Jesus was telling the truth. Why did he hit him, then? Perhaps he was scared of what would happen to him if he didn't. Perhaps he was simply a cruel person. At rock bottom, he hit Jesus because he preferred his own lies to Jesus' truth, just as Eve preferred the Serpent's lies.
So that passage, "Your word is truth" is a little more meaningful than "the Bible says that the Bible is true". I hope I'm expressing this coherently.
Jesus Prays for All Believers
20"My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: 23I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me. 24"Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world. 25"Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me. 26I have made you known to them, and will continue to make you known in order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in them."A call for unity of purpose throughout the Church that I still long to see. Thy kingdom come, on Earth as it is in Heaven. Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
John 16
This keeps me writing- good!
After having the Bible study last week, which surprisingly went for about an hour and a half, the main thing we talked about was how to communicate the Gospel with unchurched friends. The biggest barrier to that message, we felt, was apathy, and a denial of the existence of sin. It's hard to get people worked up for salvation from something they don't think exists, or is not important.
Why is it that, when asked to put the teachings of Christianity succinctly, people will say, "Be a good person and you get to go to Heaven"? Why isn't the first thing people say, "Christians believe Jesus was the Son of God and that he died sacrificially so believers in him get to go to Heaven"? Last week a woman asked me if Lutherans thought that Jews would go to Hell and seemed genuinely surprised when I (uncomfortably) said yes. I'm not mad at the woman- it was an honest and important question- but I am a little frustrated in myself and other Christians if the most basic parts of Christianity aren't communicated well.
This also implies that perhaps I don't know much about other world religions. Is the teaching of Islam really obedience to Five Pillars (Charity, going to Mecca on a pilgrimage, obedience to moral teachings, believing that there is one God and Mohammed is His Prophet, and one more)? Has my public education failed me?
Anyway, on to John 16, which begins with some leftovers from last week about persecution. Whoever divided up John screwed up that part, so I'll begin at the fifth verse:
So it appears the world is guilty on three charges: sin, righteousness, and judgment. Sin is 'missing the mark' of perfection that God has for us. The world stands guilty of sin because 'men do not believe in [Jesus]', which I take to mean that they cannot even see the target to shoot straight at it. The world stands guilty of not being righteous as well. This is proven by Jesus going to the Father; Jesus is the only righteous person, so his absence from the world highlights the absence of righteousness in the world. How 'not being righteous' is different from 'being sinful' is a little unclear. Does this just mean that we haven't done things that are good, in addition to doing things that are bad?
In any event, Jesus concludes with passing judgment on the world. It's a bit like a courtroom trial: The World has done wrong, it has not done right, and it is condemned as a result of this. The sentence, according to Paul, is physical (and spiritual) death. Good thing Jesus goes on:
One nitpick: the disciples say, "Now you are speaking clearly and without figures of speech." I think that this is one of the more difficult sections to understand, at least compared to other sections of John, where Jesus says stuff like, "Whoever believes in me will never die" or when he physically hands some bread to his betrayer, or when he predicts his death and then says the Son of God must be 'lifted up'. Use any and all to get the message across.
I know that my Redeemer lives. What comfort this sweet sentence gives.
After having the Bible study last week, which surprisingly went for about an hour and a half, the main thing we talked about was how to communicate the Gospel with unchurched friends. The biggest barrier to that message, we felt, was apathy, and a denial of the existence of sin. It's hard to get people worked up for salvation from something they don't think exists, or is not important.
Why is it that, when asked to put the teachings of Christianity succinctly, people will say, "Be a good person and you get to go to Heaven"? Why isn't the first thing people say, "Christians believe Jesus was the Son of God and that he died sacrificially so believers in him get to go to Heaven"? Last week a woman asked me if Lutherans thought that Jews would go to Hell and seemed genuinely surprised when I (uncomfortably) said yes. I'm not mad at the woman- it was an honest and important question- but I am a little frustrated in myself and other Christians if the most basic parts of Christianity aren't communicated well.
This also implies that perhaps I don't know much about other world religions. Is the teaching of Islam really obedience to Five Pillars (Charity, going to Mecca on a pilgrimage, obedience to moral teachings, believing that there is one God and Mohammed is His Prophet, and one more)? Has my public education failed me?
Anyway, on to John 16, which begins with some leftovers from last week about persecution. Whoever divided up John screwed up that part, so I'll begin at the fifth verse:
The Work of the Holy Spirit
5"Now I am going to him who sent me, yet none of you asks me, 'Where are you going?' 6Because I have said these things, you are filled with grief. 7But I tell you the truth: It is for your good that I am going away. Unless I go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. 8When he comes, he will convict the world of guilt[a] in regard to sin and righteousness and judgment: 9in regard to sin, because men do not believe in me; 10in regard to righteousness, because I am going to the Father, where you can see me no longer; 11and in regard to judgment, because the prince of this world now stands condemned.12"I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. 14He will bring glory to me by taking from what is mine and making it known to you. 15All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will take from what is mine and make it known to you.
16"In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me."
So it appears the world is guilty on three charges: sin, righteousness, and judgment. Sin is 'missing the mark' of perfection that God has for us. The world stands guilty of sin because 'men do not believe in [Jesus]', which I take to mean that they cannot even see the target to shoot straight at it. The world stands guilty of not being righteous as well. This is proven by Jesus going to the Father; Jesus is the only righteous person, so his absence from the world highlights the absence of righteousness in the world. How 'not being righteous' is different from 'being sinful' is a little unclear. Does this just mean that we haven't done things that are good, in addition to doing things that are bad?
In any event, Jesus concludes with passing judgment on the world. It's a bit like a courtroom trial: The World has done wrong, it has not done right, and it is condemned as a result of this. The sentence, according to Paul, is physical (and spiritual) death. Good thing Jesus goes on:
The Disciples' Grief Will Turn to Joy
17Some of his disciples said to one another, "What does he mean by saying, 'In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me,' and 'Because I am going to the Father'?" 18They kept asking, "What does he mean by 'a little while'? We don't understand what he is saying."19Jesus saw that they wanted to ask him about this, so he said to them, "Are you asking one another what I meant when I said, 'In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me'? 20I tell you the truth, you will weep and mourn while the world rejoices. You will grieve, but your grief will turn to joy. 21A woman giving birth to a child has pain because her time has come; but when her baby is born she forgets the anguish because of her joy that a child is born into the world. 22So with you: Now is your time of grief, but I will see you again and you will rejoice, and no one will take away your joy. 23In that day you will no longer ask me anything. I tell you the truth, my Father will give you whatever you ask in my name. 24Until now you have not asked for anything in my name. Ask and you will receive, and your joy will be complete.
25"Though I have been speaking figuratively, a time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father. 26In that day you will ask in my name. I am not saying that I will ask the Father on your behalf. 27No, the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God. 28I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father."
29Then Jesus' disciples said, "Now you are speaking clearly and without figures of speech. 30Now we can see that you know all things and that you do not even need to have anyone ask you questions. This makes us believe that you came from God."
31"You believe at last!"[b] Jesus answered. 32"But a time is coming, and has come, when you will be scattered, each to his own home. You will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me.
33"I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world."
Just when this condemnation stuff was getting everyone a little down, Jesus comes back by saying that he has overcome the world. It will look like Jesus has lost-- didn't it look like that on Good Friday and Saturday and the first part of Easter Sunday?-- but this grief will turn to joy. The disciples finally seem to get it: Jesus is the Son of God, he will go away (die), but he will come back (the Resurrection), and this will somehow connect God to people once again. Attaboy, disciples.One nitpick: the disciples say, "Now you are speaking clearly and without figures of speech." I think that this is one of the more difficult sections to understand, at least compared to other sections of John, where Jesus says stuff like, "Whoever believes in me will never die" or when he physically hands some bread to his betrayer, or when he predicts his death and then says the Son of God must be 'lifted up'. Use any and all to get the message across.
I know that my Redeemer lives. What comfort this sweet sentence gives.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
John 15
On to John 15, perhaps with a nod to something I didn't talk about in John 14 with Jesus being the Way, Truth, and Life.
One other motif on this section is bearing fruit: you're supposed to get something out of this Christianity thing. There's supposed to be a change in behavior. This is not an obligation, simply a description of the process. The things that I do come as a response to Christ's love, not as a payment for it. This fruit section has in it the seeds of some of the biggest divisions in Christianity. Surely, some would argue, if Jesus says that good branches and bad branches can be operationally identified by their fruit, Christians can be operationally identified by their good actions. Therefore, the good actions are what some would have you focus on. This is a mistake. Fruit is the proof of a good vine, an outside proxy that is easy to measure when you cannot look inside the vine itself. The vine should be the focal point.
he Vine and the Branches
1"I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. 2He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes[a] so that it will be even more fruitful. 3You are already clean because of the word I have spoken to you. 4Remain in me, and I will remain in you. No branch can bear fruit by itself; it must remain in the vine. Neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in me.5"I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. 6If anyone does not remain in me, he is like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned. 7If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be given you. 8This is to my Father's glory, that you bear much fruit, showing yourselves to be my disciples.
9"As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Now remain in my love. 10If you obey my commands, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father's commands and remain in his love. 11I have told you this so that my joy may be in you and that your joy may be complete. 12My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. 13Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. 14You are my friends if you do what I command. 15I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master's business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you. 16You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit—fruit that will last. Then the Father will give you whatever you ask in my name. 17This is my command: Love each other.
I feel like there are so many different definitions of love out there, that the term 'love' has almost become meaningless. Does love mean never having to say you're sorry? Is it as simple as just enjoying being around a person a lot? Maybe it's how multiple people can join forces to form something that none of them could ever be without the others. Is it giving of yourself without expecting anything in return? I'm more convinced that Jesus is talking about the latter. This is not a mushy kind of love, the kind that tells you your poetry is the best ever or that your song sounded swell. It's the kind of love that pushes you out of the way of a speeding bus. It's the kind that sternly says to go outside. Amy Adams has no place in this love.One other motif on this section is bearing fruit: you're supposed to get something out of this Christianity thing. There's supposed to be a change in behavior. This is not an obligation, simply a description of the process. The things that I do come as a response to Christ's love, not as a payment for it. This fruit section has in it the seeds of some of the biggest divisions in Christianity. Surely, some would argue, if Jesus says that good branches and bad branches can be operationally identified by their fruit, Christians can be operationally identified by their good actions. Therefore, the good actions are what some would have you focus on. This is a mistake. Fruit is the proof of a good vine, an outside proxy that is easy to measure when you cannot look inside the vine itself. The vine should be the focal point.
The World Hates the Disciples
18"If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. 20Remember the words I spoke to you: 'No servant is greater than his master.'[b] If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the One who sent me. 22If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin. Now, however, they have no excuse for their sin. 23He who hates me hates my Father as well. 24If I had not done among them what no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. But now they have seen these miracles, and yet they have hated both me and my Father. 25But this is to fulfill what is written in their Law: 'They hated me without reason.'[c]26"When the Counselor comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father, he will testify about me. 27And you also must testify, for you have been with me from the beginning.
Not a super-cheery section, either. Jesus is saying to expect persecution in his name. This brings up a point discussed in a Bible study between services on Sunday about Truth. It's very chic and postmodern to deny the existence of truth. We could all be brains in jars, man. Perception is reality. This went over into a discussion of persecution that people face when they try to say that there is real religious truth: Jesus Christ. And what persecution did people list? Would it be the martyrs of the faith? The men and women around the world who are killed for their faith? No. It's being greeted at Wal-mart with a 'happy holidays' instead of 'merry Christmas'. It's those nasty Democrats who want to take In God We Trust off our money.
Sidenote: How completely ticked will Jesus be when he comes back and finds God written on our money and not on our hearts? What was the point of him driving out moneychangers from the temple again?
If I go through life as a Christian, and the only persecution I have to deal with is people in class thinking I'm a moron for believing in Creationism, I'll consider myself incredibly lucky.
One last thought on this section is Jesus saying how people have no excuse for not knowing that he was the son of God. No one gets to go before God on Judgment Day and say they never knew they were breaking any rules. No one gets to say that it's not fair. In fact, Jesus is being more charitable than he has the need to be. That's what grace is.
Sunday, April 6, 2008
John 14
I've been leading a Bible Study this semester on the Gospel of St. John, and as a little writing exercise, I'd like to go through this kinda chapter by chapter, with my thoughts. Who knows? If I keep this blog for five years, I could do the whole new testament. Or at least the Gospels.
As we've been going through this week by week, I've come to remember why I like reading John more than any other book of the Bible: it reads as narrative and theological lesson. These are stories with characters, irony, purpose, as well as actual flesh and blood historical people. John does an excellent job of always showing Jesus as both Man and God, and the story as both History and Theological Study. Take Jesus weeping in John 11: a simple act that plays as history (it isn't hard to imagine a real flesh and blood guy named Jesus crying at his friend's funeral) and teaching (Jesus is true man that he should cry, Jesus must love us if he cries when his friend dies, Jesus never intended for us to die).
A little exposition for John 14: this is during Holy Week. Jesus has just come into Jerusalem, he's instituted the Lord's Supper, he's sent his betrayer packing, and he's predicted Peter's disowning him. This after Peter says, "Lord, I will lay down my life for you!" Exactly the opposite proves true. So this takes place in the upper room, still.
John 14
A very comforting section. Christ often says, "Don't be afraid!" Sometimes everyone questions whether they are Christian enough- how could God save me, I try to be a Christian and I suck at it! Let there be no doubt as to the power of God's grace.
Before it was called Christianity, some people called the new religion The Way. In contrast to an empty ceremonial ritual (spin in a circle three times, hop on one foot, and your sins are forgiven), men weren't given a method; they were given a man. Jesus is the conduit through which we see God, and through which we are put at peace with God. Nothing we do (not even very very nice things we do) can do the same. This is a statement of the exclusivity of Jesus Christ.
It reminds me of just a few chapters ago, John 10, where Jesus describes himself as both Good Shepard and gate: "I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved." Not only is he the one we need to be reconciled to, he is also the mechanism of that reconciliation. It's a hard metaphor to explain, and perhaps Jesus is mixing metaphors here.
Jesus seems to say that he's not talking about "that kind of seeing". We will "see" Christ in the actions and faith of people around us; it won't be like Jesus doing a concert at Shea Stadium so we can go or watch it on TV. It's a bit like how we see bits of other people in ourselves- I grimace and kind of stick my tongue out just like my dad does when we try to open pickle jars. I spell out my last name the same way my mother does, even though it's a really common one. I even say "dogs will be dogs" because my friends do.
If you have never met my father, and you have never seen him battle pickle jars, you wouldn't see him in me. If you don't know who Jesus is, you won't see him in others. So that's how I read that. I know it's kinda cheating when Jesus says stuff about swords and kingdoms and temples and rocks and it's all metaphorical. It's not the answer we want, but it's the answer we'll get.
This other bit about the Holy Spirit is important, too. The Holy Spirit isn't just some relic of the past that taught St. Peter and St. Paul all they knew. The Holy Spirit was present at my baptism, at my confirmation. The Holy Spirit is with us whenever we study God's Word. Whenever Jesus promises the Holy Spirit, he doesn't give an expiration date. Jesus doesn't say, "I'm sending the Holy Spirit to you guys on Pentecost, you'll speak in lots of different languages and it'll be cool, but THAT'S IT. ONE TIME DEAL."
This chapter also contains the central message of Christianity and Easter: Because I live, you also will live.
As we've been going through this week by week, I've come to remember why I like reading John more than any other book of the Bible: it reads as narrative and theological lesson. These are stories with characters, irony, purpose, as well as actual flesh and blood historical people. John does an excellent job of always showing Jesus as both Man and God, and the story as both History and Theological Study. Take Jesus weeping in John 11: a simple act that plays as history (it isn't hard to imagine a real flesh and blood guy named Jesus crying at his friend's funeral) and teaching (Jesus is true man that he should cry, Jesus must love us if he cries when his friend dies, Jesus never intended for us to die).
A little exposition for John 14: this is during Holy Week. Jesus has just come into Jerusalem, he's instituted the Lord's Supper, he's sent his betrayer packing, and he's predicted Peter's disowning him. This after Peter says, "Lord, I will lay down my life for you!" Exactly the opposite proves true. So this takes place in the upper room, still.
John 14
Jesus Comforts His Disciples
1"Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me. 2In my Father's house are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for you. 3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. 4You know the way to the place where I am going."A very comforting section. Christ often says, "Don't be afraid!" Sometimes everyone questions whether they are Christian enough- how could God save me, I try to be a Christian and I suck at it! Let there be no doubt as to the power of God's grace.
Jesus the Way to the Father
5Thomas said to him, "Lord, we don't know where you are going, so how can we know the way?"6Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."
8Philip said, "Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us."
9Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'? 10Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you are not just my own. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles themselves. 12I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing. He will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father. 13And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. 14You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.
In this section, John again hammers home a lesson found throughout his Gospel: the Disciples were pretty dumb. They didn't get this stuff. They didn't understand it. Even after Jesus tells them to not be afraid, they'll scatter latter in the evening and hide behind locked doors.Before it was called Christianity, some people called the new religion The Way. In contrast to an empty ceremonial ritual (spin in a circle three times, hop on one foot, and your sins are forgiven), men weren't given a method; they were given a man. Jesus is the conduit through which we see God, and through which we are put at peace with God. Nothing we do (not even very very nice things we do) can do the same. This is a statement of the exclusivity of Jesus Christ.
It reminds me of just a few chapters ago, John 10, where Jesus describes himself as both Good Shepard and gate: "I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved." Not only is he the one we need to be reconciled to, he is also the mechanism of that reconciliation. It's a hard metaphor to explain, and perhaps Jesus is mixing metaphors here.
Jesus Promises the Holy Spirit
15"If you love me, you will obey what I command. 16And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever— 17the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you. 18I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. 19Before long, the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. 20On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you. 21Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me. He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love him and show myself to him."22Then Judas (not Judas Iscariot) said, "But, Lord, why do you intend to show yourself to us and not to the world?"
23Jesus replied, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. 24He who does not love me will not obey my teaching. These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me.
25"All this I have spoken while still with you. 26But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you. 27Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.
28"You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you.' If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I. 29I have told you now before it happens, so that when it does happen you will believe. 30I will not speak with you much longer, for the prince of this world is coming. He has no hold on me, 31but the world must learn that I love the Father and that I do exactly what my Father has commanded me.
"Come now; let us leave.
Jesus seems to say that he's not talking about "that kind of seeing". We will "see" Christ in the actions and faith of people around us; it won't be like Jesus doing a concert at Shea Stadium so we can go or watch it on TV. It's a bit like how we see bits of other people in ourselves- I grimace and kind of stick my tongue out just like my dad does when we try to open pickle jars. I spell out my last name the same way my mother does, even though it's a really common one. I even say "dogs will be dogs" because my friends do.
If you have never met my father, and you have never seen him battle pickle jars, you wouldn't see him in me. If you don't know who Jesus is, you won't see him in others. So that's how I read that. I know it's kinda cheating when Jesus says stuff about swords and kingdoms and temples and rocks and it's all metaphorical. It's not the answer we want, but it's the answer we'll get.
This other bit about the Holy Spirit is important, too. The Holy Spirit isn't just some relic of the past that taught St. Peter and St. Paul all they knew. The Holy Spirit was present at my baptism, at my confirmation. The Holy Spirit is with us whenever we study God's Word. Whenever Jesus promises the Holy Spirit, he doesn't give an expiration date. Jesus doesn't say, "I'm sending the Holy Spirit to you guys on Pentecost, you'll speak in lots of different languages and it'll be cool, but THAT'S IT. ONE TIME DEAL."
This chapter also contains the central message of Christianity and Easter: Because I live, you also will live.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)