Nice Try, Facebook

I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.

Grade Inflation In Everything

Tonight, Alabama plays Penn State, who is starting a new QB. His stats on the night: 13/29, 144 Yards, 0 TD, 2 INT. That's an NCAA QB rating of 72.4, or an NFL QB rating of 31.4 (no, I don't know why that's different). This is the reason why Penn State is currently down by 3 touchdowns.

The play-by-play announcer asks the color commentator what grade he would give the new QB's night.

"I'd give him a B-. Lots of room for improvement, but not bad for a guy in his first big game."

I weep for the future of Higher Education in this country.

Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus

Church services aren't supposed to be tailored exactly to specific people, and we shouldn't get upset if the music is not to our liking or the pastor doesn't preach the sermon we want him or expect him to, but this morning's sermon and service were just excellent.

The Law was preached not to club other people with, but to convict listeners of their sin and to guide them in their lives of sanctification. The Gospel was preached as the solution to that sin and as a power to follow that guide and live a sanctified life. It was expository preaching from scripture, centered on Jesus Christ. There was Holy Communion, too. For those keeping score with your Small Catechisms, there was lots of means of grace in Word and Sacrament. Oh man, it was excellent.

Your three lessons for the 15th Sunday after Pentecost:

Proverbs 25:6,7

Do not exalt yourself in the king's presence,
and do not claim a place among great men;

it is better for him to say to you, "Come up here,"
than for him to humiliate you before a nobleman.

James 2:1-13

My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don't show favoritism. Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, "Here's a good seat for you," but say to the poor man, "You stand there" or "Sit on the floor by my feet," have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?

Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?

If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, "Love your neighbor as yourself," you are doing right. But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. For he who said, "Do not commit adultery," also said, "Do not murder." If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker.

Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom, because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment!

Luke 14:1,7-14

One Sabbath, when Jesus went to eat in the house of a prominent Pharisee, he was being carefully watched. When he noticed how the guests picked the places of honor at the table, he told them this parable: "When someone invites you to a wedding feast, do not take the place of honor, for a person more distinguished than you may have been invited. If so, the host who invited both of you will come and say to you, 'Give this man your seat.' Then, humiliated, you will have to take the least important place. But when you are invited, take the lowest place, so that when your host comes, he will say to you, 'Friend, move up to a better place.' Then you will be honored in the presence of all your fellow guests. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted."

Then Jesus said to his host, "When you give a luncheon or dinner, do not invite your friends, your brothers or relatives, or your rich neighbors; if you do, they may invite you back and so you will be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed. Although they cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous."

Before the service, I said to myself, "Here we go. A service on humility. A little boring, but it's a virtue and one I'm in need of, certainly."

The opening hook of the sermon started out cheesy. In the Grand Tradition of Sports Metaphors, Analogies, and Allusions, it was: "Are you ready? Are you excited? It's only one week away. It's almost time...for Football season! You may be waiting to find out which teams are good, which players are good, which coaches are the best. Not me. No, I'm excited to watch the touchdown celebrations. A running back or wide receiver will score for his team, and he'll do a dance or pull a stunt to let everyone know that he is a superior athlete, that he is the center of attention, that he should be on all the cameras and be talked about on TV."

Okay. *rolleyes*, right? Yes, we should all strive to be humble and not makes fools of ourselves on national TV. Good moral of the story, see you next week (provided the Packers have the late game).

But it got better- much better. The pastor explained exactly how it tied in with the scripture readings. How the guy who wrote Proverbs, King Solomon, had seen God in a vision or dream, and how God had told him that he would give Solomon anything he asked for. And rather than ask for power or money or influence or notoriety, Solomon asked for wisdom. Quite a humble request! So we have a bad example and a good example of humility so far.

Then the pastor tied in what Solomon wrote into what Jesus said in the Gospel reading. It's practically the same idea just expressed twice: if you take an important place for yourself, the king/guy holding the feast (God) will make you move
for a more distinguished guest. But if you take a humble place, God will exalt you. The pastor explained that this is entirely contrary to our way of thinking. We are important! We are good! We deserve a place of honor! Pride is self-centered, and self-exalting. The world expects us to be prideful, even encourages us to be prideful. We aren't relying on God, but on ourselves.

Using the Law to convict the congregation of sin? Check.

Then, he asked a very important question: why should we be humble? Because God tells us to? That's one reason, and a good one, but it wasn't what the pastor focused on. We should be humble because Jesus, the only begotten Son of God was humble. It was because of our pride and our sin that he humbled himself. The King of Kings and Lord of Lords was heralded by angels, who said that the promised Messiah had come down from Heaven to Earth and had been born not in a palace, but in a stable. The everlasting unchanging God grew in wisdom and stature. The faithful God who had led the Israelites out of captivity was betrayed by one of his closest friends, denied by another, and abandoned by the rest. He was crucified for our sins, died, and was buried. He descended into hell.*

But he rose from the dead as the only proof we will ever need that our sins are forgiven and we will rise one day too if we have faith in him.

So that's why we should be humble: because Jesus was. When we are humble, we are confessing that God was humble enough to become a man and take our place. When we are humble enough to rely entirely on God's grace instead of our own efforts, that's exactly when we are most strong. And we have the power to be humble because of what he did for us.

Fin.

What a great sermon. It was genuinely surprising, it got better as it went along, it tied the readings together, it was focused on Christ, it preached Law and Gospel, it understood sanctification. It's the second I've ever heard him preach (and I think the third he's given here- his installation was last month). If they're all going to be this good, I think St. Mark's is in capable hands for a long, long time.

*Sidenote: I remember being taught that the descent into hell was part of Jesus' glorification, not humiliation. It was declaring the victory that he had accomplished through his death; it didn't involve suffering.

I Am Truly Moderate

Behold!



I stand at the fulcrum between Michelle Obama and Glenn Beck, Democrats and Republicans, the Haves and Have-Nots, the secular and the religious, the farmers and the bankers, the modern and the postmodern.

If ever there was a man whose opinions should and must be catered to, I Am That Man. I expect to be appeased. I demand satisfaction. My attention is short, my love fickle, my influence unimaginable, and my allegiance easily bought.

First one to buy me ice cream gets my vote.

My List of Petty Personal Vendettas Grows Ever Longer

Go fuck yourself, George Will.

And should be recognized as such

You cunning worker, Daedalus!
Inventing something new
Of wax and feather stitched together
You fashioned them and flew
Above the foaming wine dark sea
Below the sun and sky
But sons are harder things than wings
To craft after they die

With All These Things That I've Done

I couldn't sleep earlier this week, so I decided to go back over my blog posts from a long time ago, just for larfs. Viewing my past writing was instructive because it created enough distance that I could see where I was being unclear (and where I was being obstinate and petty). I also would like to give more credit to Jordan and Andrew in particular. At the time, I thought you guys were being deliberately contrarian, and whether this was born of active malice, ignorance, or the puckish glee of arguing on the Internet, I couldn't say.

But now I'm beginning to grudgingly admit that you guys are pretty smart. I submit to you the following points that I'm guilty of and would like to either recant or delve into more fully:

1. Leftist Political Hackery

Most clearly seen in this post, but also in some others dealing with environmentalism, politics, and Sarah Palin (HAHAHAHAHAHA).

Is it a back-handed compliment to say that Sarah Palin is not a hypocrite and this is especially notable considering she's a Republican? Yes. That's a hacky thing to say. I'm recant the statement that 8 hypocritical Republicans constitutes 'many', even if those 8 include the Speaker of the House, House Majority Leader, and the Republican nominee for President of the United States. Since this apparently needs saying, there are crooked Republicans and good Democrats, and there are good Republicans and crooked Democrats, and neither governing philosophy leads to crookedness of necessity. I used to be of the opinion that this only mattered because only Republicans are guilty of making political hay out of their moral superiority, but Democrats have also sent us on plenty of guilt trips over welfare, health care, and torture.

2. My Modern-Jackass Philosophy of Science

I was a bad Bayesian. I was also an instrumentalist in the same post in which I fake-defended Sarah Palin. As a wannabe-engineer and not a scientist or philosopher, I pretty much don't know what I'm talking about most of the time. All we were ever explicitly taught was Popper, and as I understand it, the philosophy of science people have moved on. Falsifiability is a good thing for a scientific framework to have, but robustness, prediction, and explanatory power are necessary, too.

For example, I was doing some online organic chemistry reading the other day (I'm striving to be less of a crushing failure at life recently, so I'm trying to not lose my edge). And it turns out that Lewis Dot Structures are mostly incorrect and actually contribute to a misunderstanding of chemical bonding when you're not working with electron-rich atoms like oxygen. Molecular Orbital theory is more accurate, even though it takes longer to do. Both (and neither) give a picture of what happens in chemical bonding, but MO theory better predicts bond strengths AND has more explanatory power.

I'm willing to admit that Andy is pretty much always more correct than I am at philosophy of science stuff, with the notable exceptions of his recommending Daniel Dennett to me, along with calling me a science stopper. Science and religion are intensely important topics to me, and I have read lots of people calling for the compatibility of evolution and creation, but I've not yet seen a convincing argument combining both a scientifically sound theory of origin and theologically sound soteriology. Perhaps it's out there and I'm being obstinate again.

Also, I screwed up JS Mill hardcore.

3. Unclear Thoughts On Original Sin

If there is any topic that I wish I could understand and express more clearly, it is Original Sin. I can read or quote from Augustine, The Bondage of the Will, the Augsburg Confession, or St. Paul all I want, but Andrew and Jordan have never agreed with my views of Original Sin, and I suspect that this is because I do not present them clearly. Also, the only way of making my point is to quote scripture, the sufficiency of which Andrew and Jordan both deny. But frankly I'd be happy if they agreed I was interpreting the Bible correctly.

Consider this post on Romans 3, wherein Andrew says that people can choose to do good or evil and therefore have no innate proclivity towards one or the other. It does me (and him) no good to say that the deeds he considers good, if they are done without faith in God, are considered to be 'filthy rags' because surely this begs the question: if it truly is impossible without faith to please God, then no non-Christian can perform a Good Work. Because Andrew thinks that non-Christians can (and hence, do) perform actions that satisfy God, this is completely unconvincing to him. Jordan expresses the same thought here, and I respond similarly: the condemnation of sin is deserved, men are capable of outside obedience and works but incapable of inner or spiritual things, yadda yadda.

My discussions of ethics, morality, supererogation, justification, sanctification, and original sin are all tightly woven together and need to be clearer. I might spend some more time on them specifically in the future if I ever get around to more of Romans.